fanaticismrestrained replied to your post: fanaticismrestrained replied to your p…

Ah, okay… um. Which parts don’t make much sense?

Under the cut for spoilers

I don’t get how the gathered evidence before choosing a culprit logically points to Tsumiki… I understand gathering it from outside deduction, but what was provided at the time had very little bearing in who it was. It just felt like it wasn’t enough evidence at the time to me.